Home | About Us | Breaking News | Archives | Contact Us

   

NAVY'S GORSHKOV IMBROGLIO SHOULD NOT SOUR INDIA RUSSIA TIME TESTED DEFENCE RELATIONSHIP

 
Ranjit B Rai
        IDU Update (December 2007)

 

The Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Sureesh Mehta, a seasoned sea going 'Top Gun' aircraft carrier pilot made inferences in his Navy Day press conference on 3rd December, "as to where India's relations with Russia were heading". These sentiments in connection with India-Russia defence contracts bordering on the political, were lapped up by the media and splashed all over. Indians should to be warned that India's recent love affair with USA is still in its honey moon phase, with the first discord showing up in the 123 Nuclear deal debate now experiencing choppy seas, in and out of India's Parliament. PM Dr Manmohan Singh is fighting an uphill battle he has wowed to win, and it must be giving him many sleepless nights in bed. PM's recent brief visit to Moscow has also raised controversy, as many in opposition believe that India could have signed for two more Koondukulum nuclear reactors, and then gone to the IAEA and NSG for the safe guards and conditions, but PM chose not to. The Russian and Indian media reports have substantiated this, but Dr Manmohan Singh has claimed it would have been improper to proceed at this juncture of the deal. It is hoped this move was not a deliberate ploy to strengthen Dr Singh's hand to convince the 'Naysayers' to the 123 deal to claim that without the deal, even Russia, India's trusted friend which has seen India through many 'downs' will not supply safe guarded reactors. It is known that during the Kargil war in time of India's needs for military spares President Putin had put Russia's inventory at India's disposal.

It is also well known that the 123 deal and some connected nuclear supplies for reactors, and nuclear submarine issues have been under discussion since President Putin visited India for the Republic day parade in January. This year the Chief of Naval Staff also made public for the first time, that India's nuclear submarine project being progressed by DRDO for the last 20 years under the misnomer ATV, Advanced Technology Vehicle will be ready in the next two years, and an Akula from Russia will join the Fleet to train Indian nuclear submariners, just like the INS Chakra did from 1987 to 91 from Vishakapatnam, where the ATV is being constructed. DRDO chief M Natarajan has also confirmed the trials of an under water launched missile are progressing well, to arm submarines with this innovation, which could form India's Triad. The Navy Chief also confirmed that the Navy had 33 small and large warships and 6 Scorpene submarines on order, and another line of submarines, long range maritime aircraft and ASW helicopters are in the pipeline. The spot light has recently therefore turned on to the Indian Navy.

Admittedly Indian Navy's leadership with Government support has scripted one of the most ambitious and challenging ship building programmes in the developed world, and is the envy of many nations, at a time when steel, labour, cabling and weapons system costs world wide, are escalating. India and Russia whose economies have surged can not be isolated from this trend. World economy has also fuelled one of the best times in shipping trade, the world has experienced in decades. Nations with warship building assets have become victims of this escalation phenomenon, and US Navy has had to cancel some of its latest Littoral Combat Ships on order, and scale down its ambitions. US Navy has scaled down its 600 ship Navy target, as has the Royal Navy. Admiral Mike Mullen former US Navy CNO who visited India earlier this year, and now Chairman JCS therefore proposed a cooperative 1000 ship Navy and considers Indian Navy incorporated, after the successful advanced five nation Malabar-07 exercises in the Bay of Bengal in September.

With this background it is no surprise Russia has raised the price of completing and modifying the Gorshkov( INS Vikramaditya) as per Indian Navy's required specifications and mixed weapon fits which according to the Russian stance were not clearly spelt out when the contract was hurriedly signed by RM Defence Minister George Fernandes after years of somnolence. Modifications cost any ship builder if not catered for in the initial stages.In India shipyards also face the same issues but charge the customer as most warship contracts are cost plus.

MOD's yards are over due for capacity and capability enhancement and India's domestic warship building capacity under MOD is inadequate for Navy's current ambitious programme. The other two shipyards under Ministry of Shipping, Hindustan Shipyard Ltd and Cochin Shipyard Ltd which has the order for the delayed indigenous aircraft carrier, are flush with merchant ship orders. They have not even bid for the Navy's tanker and the order is likely to go to Fincanteiri of Italy. The Navy's entire large warship building programmes are in the hands of and the procedures are controlled by, a Joint Secretary in the Defence production wing. The dilatory procedure is antiquated, erratic and inadequate, with inadequate powers in the hands of the Chairmen of the MOD shipyards or the customer, in this case the Navy which has a recommendatory role. It has therefore become customary to issue letters of intent for ships on yards and begin price negotiations as soon as a design is ready, with out finalizing the many weapon and other critical fits. This appears to have happened in the case of the Gorshkov and this despite an Indian team supervising the refit at Sevrmash yard where the CMD has been sacked. The ultimate escalated tab is borne by the Navy and the nation. In the case of INS Vikramaditya(Gorshkov) the time consuming and very important cabling contract which is the starting block in any modification to suit the revised weapon and equipment fits, has run in to trouble and has been inordinately delayed by nearly 2 years and escalated.

However this impasse on the escalation in the cost of Gorshkov should not be a reason to down play our defence relations and inter twining with a time tested ally like Russia, which is now in a resurgent mood with a healthy economy and a revived military. India has too many of its security eggs in the Russian basket, and they cannot be down played. President Putin's party's resounding victory in the elections gives his Government more muscle to tackle larger issues, unlike India where the coalition partners tend behave as adversaries at times. It will be prudent for both negotiating parties to sit down and work things out but more important both countries have to see to new methods of negotiating contracts and speedily implementing them with out rancour. As the CNS confirmed the Navy needs the Gorshkov and a mere Gorshkov should not sour India's defence relations with Russia.

Cmde Ranjit B Rai
C 443 Defence Colony ND- 24
Ph: 24330087